FAQ
Why use the term feral tissue and not the common term?
Two reasons. One, the common term has a lot of scientific and emotional baggage associated with it. We are inviting people to think in a new way and sometimes it helps to use new language. Second, our culture’s current political experiment with censorship and control make it preferable not to use words that are, in essence, ‘copyrighted’ by the establishment.
What is the purpose of this website
The purpose of this website is to present a new model of feral tissue. Why it develops and how we might revert it to benign tissue again. It is hoped that this website will stimulate conversations in the scientific field, and and lead to laboratory and clinical work that will either prove, evolve or disprove it’s premises.
Can this model be done with other modalities?
Every modality is different. That is a question for your doctor.
When should we see results?
Unlike other models that prioritize the destruction of feral tissue, this model considers the reversal of feral tissue to a benign state a ‘win’. As such, while a decrease in mass size may happen over time, it is not an initial primary goal. The initial hope would be a normalization of blood chemistries, an improvement of energy, and a slowing, then full stop of all further increases of mass size, which we hope to see in 2 months.
If this is true, why didn't anyone discover this before?
The discovery of the Feral Tissue model required someone that had an understanding of gastroenterology, toxicology, biochemistry and oncology. In today’s world, with so much information available, most scientists specialize in one field. This was not a model a specialist would easily discover.
Why not fight it. Isn't feral tissue trying to kill me?
Consider the scientific and psychological implications of anthropomorphizing (ascribing human attributes) to feral tissue. Scientifically, it means that feral tissue is ‘other’, is dangerous, is the enemy and it must be destroyed. Psychologically, it creates fear and a sense of powerlessness and implies a betrayal of our bodies. Are these useful perspectives? Another perspective is that feral tissue is the unintended consequence of a series of normal cellular programs happening at the wrong time and place that our environment has triggered that began as an attempt to help us deal with a SCFA deficiency. If we can change the environment and turn off these programs, we may have the results we are looking without ‘going to war’ with our own tissue. This new perspective turns feral tissue from a ‘dangerous other’ to be killed into ‘misunderstood and traumatized’ tissue to be recovered. Fear, powerlessness and betrayal are replaced with hope, confidence and compassion. That is not to say that we should be harmless and have no aggression. Our immune systems are aggressive and should be so. What is means is that we should not be aggressive with tissue that is both confused and recoverable. We can save aggression for its rightful use, that is, the destruction of any feral tissue that may be too far gone to be recovered.